From a report by Andrew Breitbart in the Washington Times:

Now that White House "Green Jobs Czar" Van Jones (pictured) has resigned, what's next?

Inevitably, the American mainstream media - ABC, NBC, CBS, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Time, Newsweek, et al - must be held to account for sitting on the sidelines as this major story kept building without them, went viral on YouTube, and then became so large that a key appointee of President Obama was forced to step down.

Breitbart is right - the Van Jones story barely made the third page beyond the obits in most papers - if it appeared at all.

When it comes to political stories, the main stream media seems to think, “if we don’t cover a story, the story's absence proves it didn't happen.”

The media decision to ignore the Jones story may have actually done Mr. Obama more harm than good:

Who vetted this guy? How did he get past the FBI? What did he say, and how did he answer the infamous seven-page questionnaire that all Obama appointees were required to fill out? Inquiring Freedom of Information Act minds want to know.

For most people in this country, the resignation was the first they had heard of Van Jones.

For this sin of journalistic omission, there's institutional media blame. Bias is too tame a word for the utter shamelessness on display: Only Republican scandals - real and imagined - matter.

It’s more than just those called "mobs" or "tea baggers" by the media that are taking notice.

Diminishing audience and evaporating subscriptions reflect widespread consumer dissatisfaction. Eventually, the money will run out.

But until then, the growing alternative media of Internet and talk radio and a burgeoning mass of justifiably angry Americans will make every effort to expose the sham that is mainstream journalism.

As if Van Jones racial rants, radical background and calling Republicans X-rated names weren’t enough - he was a signed member of a 9/11 "truther" group that believed the Bush administration brought down the twin towers. And, by the way, he has also stated that he is a communist.

Compounding the problem, the Jones narrative hurts Mr. Obama because it underlines how the mainstream media helped elect the president by glorifying him instead of vetting him.

Just as Mr. Obama was not even cursorily investigated, Van Jones, a fellow "community organizer," was not given the slightest media attention when named as an unaccountable "czar" selected to oversee billions in taxpayer money for the ambiguous purpose of "green energy." And that despite having a body of damning evidence that could be found with a single Google search by an ADHD-addled high-school journalism student.

More of the story here.